“Chronological snobbery is self-defeating, for the more up-to-date the look is, the sooner it will be dated. If you take your stand on the prevalent view, how long do you suppose it will prevail? All you can really say about my taste is that it is old fashioned; yours will soon be the same.” -C.S. Lewis, "An Experiment In Criticism "
We come today to the final installment of this series of essays entitled: Bible Bingo & Other Stuff. If you have not had a chance to read this series from the beginning, go back a bit on this blog site. There is a certain, non-linear logic to all of what we have been discussing. But, if you’re too engaged to do so – allow me a moment to summarize.
I began with the simple contention that we all seek the miraculous in our lives. I have affirmed that this is a good thing because the early church prayed for God to extend His hand to perform signs and wonders. It follows then that any prayer lifted up to God carries within it the hope of Divine intervention, which is, by definition, a miracle. Who would waste time praying that God would just stay put? (Actually, now that I think about it, some actually do pray along those lines. That stripe of theology prays for strength to endure the ravages and attacks of Satan and his destroying and corrupting ways. I suppose we all need that – but I think it is more biblical and more kingdom advancing to cry out to God that He show up and change and fix and heal those things – that His kingdom and His will would be done on earth as it is in heaven. John described Jesus' ministry like this: “The Son of man came to destroy the works of the devil.” It would seem to follow then that our lives are to pick up where Jesus left off – stirring up a holy anger and contending against the destruction of the destroyer – not merely enduring as passive victims subject to the whims of the enemy of our soul – and other's souls.)
I would like to round off the discussion with a few more thoughts as it relates to the American Church and her fascination, allegiance, and dependence on forms and methodologies rather than the supernatural power of God. Let me relate a simple story that illustrates this point.
This past weekend I found myself in a local hardware store. I bumped into a dear brother in Christ who had been preaching in view of a call as Pastor to a certain, small, fundamentalist type of church. I thought it odd when he told me of his invitation to go there and speak, inasmuch that he is of the charismatic persuasion. In other words, he believes in all of the gifts of the spirit. This little church was started by a bigger church as a “mission”. The bigger church does not believe at all in the gifts of the Spirit. That is their form. It is called dispensationalism. After three successful weeks of preaching and a great response from the congregation, the larger church caught wind of it and said that unless he gave up his beliefs in the gifts of the Spirit and only preached from the King James Version of the Bible, he was not a good candidate to become Pastor of the mission.
I share that story to underscore a point. The fundamentalist church had a certain philosophy, a certain methodology; a certain form that they thought was exactly the right one delivered from heaven to get the job done. Every denomination and every individual church – even this ministry – carries the same blindness to one extent or another. That is why I am somewhat suspicious of too eager a commitment and excitement for a “new” way of doing things. A lot of movements become engrossed in tinkering with form. And, as history has shown time and time again, the fascination with form can actually crowd God right out of the organization - whose original stated purpose was, in fact, to bring Him glory.
In the ponderous Russian novel, The Brothers Karamazov, there is a telling discussion that takes place between two of the Karamazov brothers – one (Ivan) is a product of the age of enlightenment who is, at best, an agnostic. The other brother (Alyosha) is a Christian. Ivan tells Alyosha that he desires to share with him a short story that he has written, entitled “The Grand Inquisitor.” The story is set in Seville, Spain during the time of the Spanish Inquisition. The Grand Inquisitor is the man in charge of rooting out heretics and burning them. Into this story, Jesus appears on the streets of Seville and begins to re-enact his miraculous ministry on earth. The Grand Inquisitor has Jesus arrested, thrown in jail, and lets him know – in no uncertain terms – that tomorrow he will have Jesus burned at the stake. His reasoning for this egregious act is that the church has finally figured things out. The Grand Inquisitor tells Jesus that the church no longer needs him and that once they kill him, they do not want him to return. Jesus sits silently throughout this story.
The point that Dostoevsky makes by including this short story in the middle of his novel is to point a rightful finger of accusation at the church. The church has become accustomed to the trendy, to the newest model of ministry, to the latest, most relevant and most "effective" form. One church growth publication even published a newsletter with this unfortunate title: “What’s Hot & What’s Not!” The publication was simply ga-ga over cushioned chairs and hostile toward church pews. This "revelation" was supposed to help the church reach the lost! Paul, having been raised and educated in a system and form that was devoid of power said it this way: “…having a form of godliness, but denying its power.” (II Tim 3:5) We could easily stop at the word “form” in this passage and leap right over to the phrase: “but denying its power.” A reliance on form, rather than the miraculous, supernatural power of God’s Spirit, drains the church of her greatest weapon in this supernatural battle in which we find ourselves.
And so, I wrap things up with this passage: “So now the Lord says, ‘Stop right where you are! Look for the ancient and godly paths, and walk in them.” Jeremiah 6:16. The ancient paths for the church where we must return are those elemental acts and stories found in the gospels and in the Book of Acts. Simple people – some of whom were disparaged as unlearned and ignorant men – matched the words of their witness with the power of God. This is what they cried out for and God answered. No method, no form, no system that we can come up with can equal the persuasive power of God working through humble and obedient hearts. It wins hearts and minds whenever and wherever it is tried. We cannot improve upon God’s method, God’s form, or God’s system. People in this post-modern culture are not so much asking “if” there is a God; they are asking whether or not our God is the real deal. We owe them the real time revelation of a loving God who has commissioned us to announce and bring forth His kingdom on this earth in all of its glory, grace, love and power.
We come today to the final installment of this series of essays entitled: Bible Bingo & Other Stuff. If you have not had a chance to read this series from the beginning, go back a bit on this blog site. There is a certain, non-linear logic to all of what we have been discussing. But, if you’re too engaged to do so – allow me a moment to summarize.
I began with the simple contention that we all seek the miraculous in our lives. I have affirmed that this is a good thing because the early church prayed for God to extend His hand to perform signs and wonders. It follows then that any prayer lifted up to God carries within it the hope of Divine intervention, which is, by definition, a miracle. Who would waste time praying that God would just stay put? (Actually, now that I think about it, some actually do pray along those lines. That stripe of theology prays for strength to endure the ravages and attacks of Satan and his destroying and corrupting ways. I suppose we all need that – but I think it is more biblical and more kingdom advancing to cry out to God that He show up and change and fix and heal those things – that His kingdom and His will would be done on earth as it is in heaven. John described Jesus' ministry like this: “The Son of man came to destroy the works of the devil.” It would seem to follow then that our lives are to pick up where Jesus left off – stirring up a holy anger and contending against the destruction of the destroyer – not merely enduring as passive victims subject to the whims of the enemy of our soul – and other's souls.)
I would like to round off the discussion with a few more thoughts as it relates to the American Church and her fascination, allegiance, and dependence on forms and methodologies rather than the supernatural power of God. Let me relate a simple story that illustrates this point.
This past weekend I found myself in a local hardware store. I bumped into a dear brother in Christ who had been preaching in view of a call as Pastor to a certain, small, fundamentalist type of church. I thought it odd when he told me of his invitation to go there and speak, inasmuch that he is of the charismatic persuasion. In other words, he believes in all of the gifts of the spirit. This little church was started by a bigger church as a “mission”. The bigger church does not believe at all in the gifts of the Spirit. That is their form. It is called dispensationalism. After three successful weeks of preaching and a great response from the congregation, the larger church caught wind of it and said that unless he gave up his beliefs in the gifts of the Spirit and only preached from the King James Version of the Bible, he was not a good candidate to become Pastor of the mission.
I share that story to underscore a point. The fundamentalist church had a certain philosophy, a certain methodology; a certain form that they thought was exactly the right one delivered from heaven to get the job done. Every denomination and every individual church – even this ministry – carries the same blindness to one extent or another. That is why I am somewhat suspicious of too eager a commitment and excitement for a “new” way of doing things. A lot of movements become engrossed in tinkering with form. And, as history has shown time and time again, the fascination with form can actually crowd God right out of the organization - whose original stated purpose was, in fact, to bring Him glory.
In the ponderous Russian novel, The Brothers Karamazov, there is a telling discussion that takes place between two of the Karamazov brothers – one (Ivan) is a product of the age of enlightenment who is, at best, an agnostic. The other brother (Alyosha) is a Christian. Ivan tells Alyosha that he desires to share with him a short story that he has written, entitled “The Grand Inquisitor.” The story is set in Seville, Spain during the time of the Spanish Inquisition. The Grand Inquisitor is the man in charge of rooting out heretics and burning them. Into this story, Jesus appears on the streets of Seville and begins to re-enact his miraculous ministry on earth. The Grand Inquisitor has Jesus arrested, thrown in jail, and lets him know – in no uncertain terms – that tomorrow he will have Jesus burned at the stake. His reasoning for this egregious act is that the church has finally figured things out. The Grand Inquisitor tells Jesus that the church no longer needs him and that once they kill him, they do not want him to return. Jesus sits silently throughout this story.
The point that Dostoevsky makes by including this short story in the middle of his novel is to point a rightful finger of accusation at the church. The church has become accustomed to the trendy, to the newest model of ministry, to the latest, most relevant and most "effective" form. One church growth publication even published a newsletter with this unfortunate title: “What’s Hot & What’s Not!” The publication was simply ga-ga over cushioned chairs and hostile toward church pews. This "revelation" was supposed to help the church reach the lost! Paul, having been raised and educated in a system and form that was devoid of power said it this way: “…having a form of godliness, but denying its power.” (II Tim 3:5) We could easily stop at the word “form” in this passage and leap right over to the phrase: “but denying its power.” A reliance on form, rather than the miraculous, supernatural power of God’s Spirit, drains the church of her greatest weapon in this supernatural battle in which we find ourselves.
And so, I wrap things up with this passage: “So now the Lord says, ‘Stop right where you are! Look for the ancient and godly paths, and walk in them.” Jeremiah 6:16. The ancient paths for the church where we must return are those elemental acts and stories found in the gospels and in the Book of Acts. Simple people – some of whom were disparaged as unlearned and ignorant men – matched the words of their witness with the power of God. This is what they cried out for and God answered. No method, no form, no system that we can come up with can equal the persuasive power of God working through humble and obedient hearts. It wins hearts and minds whenever and wherever it is tried. We cannot improve upon God’s method, God’s form, or God’s system. People in this post-modern culture are not so much asking “if” there is a God; they are asking whether or not our God is the real deal. We owe them the real time revelation of a loving God who has commissioned us to announce and bring forth His kingdom on this earth in all of its glory, grace, love and power.
1 comment:
I Corinthians 16:24 “My love to all of you in Christ Jesus. Amen.” Hmmm. Not bad. Yes, that works for me. It is harmless AND encouraging. It is exactly how I feel. Amazing. G00000 God! My love to all who read these rants…..Amen.
Dear Curt, i was truly ministered to through your BB&OSTUFF writings,
the sweetness of Christ encouraged me through you this morning~and we folks on the front range need it desperately, paula
Post a Comment